End Justifies the Means

Does The End Justify The Means? First, lets label to understand the sense in which the forge justifies is used in the familiar avouchment that the annul justifies the mode. After that we croup view the problem you raise about whether it is only right to employ any core keen or bad so long as the end is close. When we range that close to thing is reassert, we are simply reckoning that it is right. Thus, for example, when we state that a college is justified in liberation a student who f e precise(prenominal)s under a passing mark, we are acknowledging that the college has a right to set certain standards of surgical procedure and to require its students to meet them.Hence, the college is right in expelling the student who doesnt. In to the highest degree societies, killing a gentlemans gentleman world is seen as a bad thing to do. But what do you do when a country declares war against you? The end in this case is the end of the war. If you do cypher and stic k to your moral grounds, you will be destroyed, but the war will be over. If you take up arms to struggle yourself, you are violating your moral code for the pursuit of stopping the war.. An enterprise erect copy only if it has a inclination. To achieve that purpose an effective method acting should be adopted.The method can be harmless with no violence in it. Or it can be hard and cruel which calls for a lot of violence. In both cases the end is the same. Only the method of achieving it is different. The proverb, a genuinely disputable whizz, means that if the remnant is good the methods adopted for achieving it do not function. It can be good or bad. The Florentine statesman, Machiavelli, in his book THE PRINCE advocated this doctrine. harmonize to him, it is justifiable to go to any extent for achieving a good cause. It may be inevitable to use violence sometimes.It will be harmful to some people. But all that can be justified if the goal is good. Some great Indian lea ders and thinkers like Gandhi ingest opposed this doctrine. According to them it is not only necessary that goal should be good but the means adopted for achieving it should also be good. In some countries governmentsresortto anything for persecuteing riots. When peaceful requests and twaddle fail to bring about the desired result, they use sheer force to suppress such riots. They argue that it is for the common good of the ublic. Whatever be the rectitude, the doctrine the end justifies the means happens to be a very controversial one which provokes much cerebration and dispute. This phrase, originating from Niccolo Machiavellis book The Prince, is interpreted by some to mean doing anything whatsoever that is required to get in the result you want, regardless of the methods used. It does not matter whether these methods are legal or illegal, comme il faut or foul, kind or cruel, truth or lies, democratic or dictatorial, good or evil.Some agree that the statement is better however, others dont see it that focus. . When a man reaches worthy means with dishonorable methods, how does that feel within a human soul? Because people have a Conscience, whenever they like it or not, people have to feel for others when they do something bad.. Another view, the benefits from something preponderate the process attained. For example if somebody older cancer, but he/she had to kill one cancer patient to find the cure.They would say that the fact that they cured cancer make the loss of one life to spell many worth it. The other way would mean something like the process makes the exit worth it, which doesnt make much sense. On the other hand, if the end is worth the cost, past it is fine to eliminate the undesirables. However, the problems arise when judicial decision if it is worth it, and if the undesirable might be of potential value later. For example, assassinating undesirables that are murderers is justified in that it saves future lives.